User Forum


Helpful Links and Info
Search
Use Advanced Search
Go Back   NI User Forums > Producer Area > REAKTOR

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 30-06-2005, 11:27
Forum Member
Thread Starter  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 441
granular synthesis = granular sampling?

Theoretical question about granular synthesis: does it mean the same as granular sampling, which we know from Reaktor?

I could imagine a granular synthesizer, with hudreds of oscillators and very short AR envelopes, which would generate the grain cloud, every grain generated by independent osciallator... Does it make sense? I guess I must buy "Microsound" by Curtis Roads...
  #2  
Old 30-06-2005, 11:47
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 53
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

granular sampling is pretty much the same as granular synthesis.
of course your grains could come from anywhere.
keep in mind that microsound is more about pulsar synthesis than granular synthesis. while they do seem very similar, they can produce very different results.
  #3  
Old 30-06-2005, 15:43
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,933
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

arturnowak wrote:
I could imagine a granular synthesizer, with hudreds of oscillators and very short AR envelopes, which would generate the grain cloud, every grain generated by independent osciallator... Does it make sense? I guess I must buy "Microsound" by Curtis Roads...
have you had a look at GrainCloud v0.1 By Sola X in the user library?
maybe not quite what say, but along the same lines.

sowari
  #4  
Old 30-06-2005, 17:22
NI Product Owner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 514
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

Granular synthesis can be used as an umbrella term to refer to all sorts of granular techniques, but it specifically refers to techniques using synthetic grains (for instance, grains consisting of sine waves, sawtooth waves, FM waves, etc.).

Roads (and others) use the term granulation to refer to granular sampling (as in Reaktor's built-in modules).

Microsound is NOT necessarily more about pulsar synthesis than any other of the techniques Roads describes (granular synthesis, granulation of sound files, trainlets, grainlets, glissons, convolution, wavelet transform, etc.).

I've actually built both a Reaktor version of Pulsar Generator and a large graincloud synthesizer (which implements glissons, filtering of each grain, FM, etc.), although neither is completely bug-free. Perhaps when I become more familiar with the core, I'll try to do R5 versions.
  #5  
Old 30-06-2005, 17:55
NI Product Owner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 514
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

sowari wrote:
have you had a look at GrainCloud v0.1 By Sola X in the user library?
maybe not quite what say, but along the same lines.
Actually, my large graincloud synth is based on this, with all sorts of additions, like per-grain FM, grain waveform morphing, stochastically attracted or repelled glissons, per-grain filtering, grain pitch quantization etc. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to rid it of some annoying bugs. Some sounds made using (only) this synth:

http://www.redwierenga.com/reaktor/redklang1.mp3
http://www.redwierenga.com/reaktor/redklang2.mp3
http://www.redwierenga.com/reaktor/redklang3.mp3
  #6  
Old 30-06-2005, 19:32
NI Product Owner
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 110
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

sw004g wrote:
Actually, my large graincloud synth is based on this, with all sorts of additions, like per-grain FM, grain waveform morphing, stochastically attracted or repelled glissons, per-grain filtering, grain pitch quantization etc. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to rid it of some annoying bugs. Some sounds made using (only) this synth:

http://www.redwierenga.com/reaktor/redklang1.mp3
http://www.redwierenga.com/reaktor/redklang2.mp3
http://www.redwierenga.com/reaktor/redklang3.mp3
Redklang1 sounds really interesting. Nice work!

I was intrigued at how much Redklang3 sounded like water spraying in a shower stall. This probably says something about granularity of sound in the natural world (similar parameters, randomized within fairly narrow constraints).
  #7  
Old 01-07-2005, 00:14
NI Product Owner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 514
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

ashtangakasha wrote:
I was intrigued at how much Redklang3 sounded like water spraying in a shower stall. This probably says something about granularity of sound in the natural world (similar parameters, randomized within fairly narrow constraints).
Totally. One of the primary bases for Xenakis' use of stochastics was the description of natural phenomena by means of simple rules. One of his examples, for instance, was that of a crowd at a political demonstration. Perry Cook and Barry Truax, among others, have used stochastic granular techniques to model everything from glass breaking to water dropping to maracas.
  #8  
Old 01-07-2005, 07:37
Forum Member
Thread Starter  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 441
Re: granular synthesis = granular sampling?

sowari wrote:
have you had a look at GrainCloud v0.1 By Sola X in the user library?
maybe not quite what say, but along the same lines.
Thanks Sowari, now I really know what granular synthesis means!

I's a pitty this sort of synthesis is not explored much. Granular sampling is popular for time-stretching etc, to make even faster disco music... But sythesis is forgotten...
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:08.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.