In Sticky Assign Multiple Paramters To Macro Controls & Assign Minimum/maximum Values.

Macro multiple parameters assignment suggestion need more support over at beta forum.
Here we have nice 4 pages of this old request. This would be killer feature!
Kai @ NI please make it reality

 

Nop...
If we could map different parameters to the same CC we could at least have a macro from an external controller but not even that is possible, Maschine only allows a CC# to be used once.

 

One wonders, if we can map different params to one macro within Massive and then control that macro with a macro in MK3.

How hard could it be development wise to allow mapping different params from different FX in a FX send group to one macro knob in MK3?

 

What gets to be worked on doesn't seem at all defined by implementation difficulty so if something is easy or not to implement doesn't matter... I reckon making Maschine software work on a standalone is a huge undertaking yet... here it is. :S

Yes, that's possible. In Massive a Macro is more literal, it can control a ton of knobs.. then in Maschine, a Massive Macro can be a single Parameter knob.

 

thanks. thats exactly what i do. but what would be useful is to be able to assign one macro knob in MK3 to a bunch of parameters of send FX. I guess that maybe be something for the future.

 

This be fantastic to enable really dynamic and expressive changes during recording or performance

 

Not sure that this fits with the specific title but I think having more customization in the macros would be somewhat easy to accomplish. I'm thinking along the lines of controlling external gear.

First would be custom range options for cc messages. Be it using only 63/64 for on/off functions, or limiting filter cutoff so it doesn't go below x amount.

Second would be value aliases, the option to convert 0-127 into a range that displays something more relevant to the parameter, ON/OFF for my example above, or 0-100% range, or a bi-polar additive mode that displays +/-64 values.

 

+1

 

+1

 

+1

 

Here is another one that's just been totally ignored by NI. This is such a basic feature but they won't put time into it because it won't help sell more products. I have to admit I think of this company as one I don't want to support even though I'm a longtime maschine lover and user. They are just so bad at responding to requests and so good at making more trendy and boring sample packs. I really have grown to not respect this company anymore. Just look at how long a simple feature has been requested and ignored. They don't care about anything but money. The leader of the company, not the employees. I'm positive that there are awesome people working there but they are lead by money instead of love for creativity.

 

It is true that many requests during all these years have been ignored. We have seen features added to maschine recently to prepare for the release of maschine +. And I imagine in their defense that the development team prioritized work on maschine +. This relegated many requests to the background. Now that maschine + has been released, we can hope that development will accelerate to get us out of functionality in a shorter time.
Now they are paying artists to design expansions. They could instead pay developers to advance the software...

 

turn down for what