1. IMPORTANT:
    We launched a new online community and this space is now closed. This community will be available as a read-only resources until further notice.
    JOIN US HERE

Kontact is a F**kin' BUGGY software!!!!!

Discussion in 'KONTAKT' started by jjfreqy, Feb 20, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jjfreqy

    jjfreqy NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    11
    For those of us who...

    OK, for those of us who recently spent too much money already(MAC G5 dual 1.8, gig of ram, Logic, Kontact, sample tank 2, moinitor, etc) and can't afford to get anything else, I'm going to have TO BUG THE S#@T OUT OF NI UNTIL THEY GET THIS FIXED!!!!!!

    Now, what I'm saying is that I think all of us who have this problem (and those who don't have this prob, but want to help) should do something proactive until NI fixes the problem. I thought about it and all we can basically do is e-mail NI *EVERYDAY* until something happens... like they fix the problem or give us an approx. date of the fixes.

    I also thought this may piss them off a bit, but OH WELL! I PAID MONEY FOR A PRODUCT THAT DOESN'T WORK 90% of the time!!! I get paid for my music and I have projects due yesterday that requires a sampler most of the time! I will start this today and I'll e-mail them from a different address until I get some positive results. What do you guys think?


    J
     
  2. Septimus

    Septimus NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    5
    Here's what my girlfriend suggests. As many of us are trying to use this useless product to MAKE $$$, she said that we should contact the Better Business Bureau. She's already working on a letter for me. (Damn I love fiesty girls like that!) She figures that the more people the BBB hears from regarding NI, the more they'll point their lens in that direction. I guess flooding NI with email isn't a bad idea either, but why do I get the feeling that they have a special circular file for just such correspondance. I'd like to be able to boycot the damn product, but that's not going to happen...
     
  3. satellite

    satellite Forum Member

    Messages:
    82
    i agree with all of this, sadly.

    A year has past since I jumped into KONTAKT, and followed these boards way too often hoping that we would see a stable product for MAC, but it never happened. I don't understand how REASON can work really pretty flawlessly compared to KONTAKT? I work with a TDM ProTools system and REASON is fine. For mock-up orchestral work, I am thinking of just hooking up my setup circa 1988 which was a KURZEIL and a midi interface! Solid, and if it is for pre-production than who cares if the midi strings are cheesy. On the other hand, the whole point of KONTAKT and Streaming it to do mock-orchestral work that can actually air, for TV music usage, which I am thinking KONTAKT is falling short.

    I am currently rendering everything as an audio track immediately after recording with KONTAKT for fear of CRASHES! TOO many problems to list here. Just totally unprofessional.
     
  4. rnarde

    rnarde NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    7
    ...

    I think its time for us to take a closer look at Mach 5? I like the better
    business B idea, You cannot say a product can do this and that, and not have it
    work. Please keep us posted on sending our problem with NI to the Better
    Business Bureau. NI has not put the proper resources into this product, and I know
    we have been more then patient with waiting for "the next version" . For
    those of you who have Kontakt working-thats good ( we are in envy I think) but
    from what I can tell, your the minority, not majority, that is the essence of
    what is wrong here. Just food for thought about where we go from here.

    Ray and Josh Music & Sound Designs
    RNARDE@AOL.COM
    773-866-1950-Studio
    773-294-5970-Cell
    4143 N. Whipple #2
    Chicago IL, 60618
     
  5. Septimus

    Septimus NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    5
    That's a good point.
    MOTU's Mach Five is looking very enticing. However, I'm not going to make the same mistake I made when buying NI's piece of junk. Forewarned is forearmed as they used to say. (They also used to say "fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me")
    I'm lucky enough to have a mutual friend at MOTU, so I've sent him a querry re. M5's specs: disk streaming, Mac compatibility etc. When I get a response, I'll paste it here.
    I'd rather not feel that it's absolutely *necessary* to buy a PC for Gigastudio if there's still an alternative!
     
  6. esteso

    esteso NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    89
    Hi all, I know that a lot of us are angry and that is understandable. I've done my share of bitchin' too but I don't think letters to the BBB or undue harrassment will attain the goal of functioning software in OSX. Sure, let 'em know you're unhappy but I'm positive nobody wants it to work more than NI.

    Think about it, it's not some conspiracy, they've grown too fast and are probably understaffed. Maybe they're a little mystified by OSX. So am I.

    Maybe there is a way we can all pull together and help. Here's what I suggest. NI starts answering all these emails personally to find out exactly what's going on. They spend a little time on the phone with us and try to help with our individual issues.
     
  7. Septimus

    Septimus NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    5
    Here's what the MOTU folks sent me regarding Mach 5, and, for that matter, streaming from HD in general. It's a very informative reply:

    Mach Five is currently RAM based. We expect to ship an update that will include disk streaming sometime in the next month or so. The update will be free.
    My understanding is that the streaming technology used by Kontact and Gigasampler is the same basic technology. I have not seen the streaming version of Mach Five, but it's possible that the same technology will also be used in Mach Five.
    What I have seen and what I have been told in technical circles is that streaming is very CPU intensive. My understanding is that if a computer is streaming samples and also playing audio tracks, that will affect the overall efficiency of the system. Gigasampler is recommended to be run on a dedicated computer and that does make sense. To make a fair comparison between Gigasampler and another streaming sampler, you'd have to run the other sampler on it's own dedicated computer. It's possible that your EMac is overall not a good choice for streaming samples and playing audio tracks simultaneously. When the streaming update for Mach Five is close to release we'll be able to give more specific bench mark tests. My comments are based on my general understanding of the technology. Certainly more RAM in the computer would be a more efficient way of working as opposed to streaming from disk. If you have to run sample libraries that exceed available RAM, you may want consider working Gigasampler-style and get a dedicated computer for the streaming sampler.
     
  8. esteso

    esteso NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    89
    (continued)

    They get a clearer idea of what's going on. They compile a list of best versions of OSX, Logic, dp etc., current issues, best hardware configs... just like digi publishes approved stuff.

    A lot of work, yes? But look what you get.

    Now NI is utilizing all these guys as beta testers in an aboveboard way. We know what works and what doesn't work in the real world. Invaluable, no? Also, your customers love you because they know you are doing everything possible (and you're doing it visibly too) And as a gesture of appreciation to these beta testers, you can offer one of your other products at a significant savings. win - win
     
  9. Darren

    Darren NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    32
    OT - Today is Grey Tuesday

    Today only for those who have not heard - the Gray Album - hip hop remix of
    Jay Z"s "Black Album" and The Beatles "White Album"

    Tuesday, February 24 will be a day of coordinated civil disobedience:
    websites will post Danger Mouse"s Grey Album on their site for 24 hours in
    protest of EMI"s attempts to censor this work.

    DJ Danger Mouse created a remix of Jay-Z"s the Black Album and the Beatles
    White Album, and called it the Grey Album. Jay-Z"s record label,
    Roc-A-Fella, released an a capella version of his Black Album specifically
    to encourage remixes like this one. But despite praise from music fans and
    major media outlets like Rolling Stone ("an ingenious hip-hop record that
    sounds oddly ahead of its time") and the Boston Globe (which called it the
    "most creatively captivating" album of the year), EMI has sent cease and
    desist letters demanding that stores destroy their copies of the album and
    websites remove them from their site. EMI claims copyright control of the
    Beatles 1968 White Album.

    Danger Mouse"s album is one of the most "respectful" and undeniably positive
    examples of sampling; it honors both the Beatles and Jay-Z. Yet the lawyers
    and bureaucrats at EMI have shown zero flexibility and not a glimmer of
    interest in the artistic significance of this work. And without a clearly
    defined right to sample (e.g. compulsory licensing), the five major record
    labels will continue to use copyright in a reactionary and narrowly
    self-interested manner that limits and erodes creativity. Their actions are
    also self-defeating: good new music is being created that people want to
    buy, but the major labels are so obsessed with hoarding their copyrights
    that they are literally turning customers away.


    http://www.greytuesday.org/


    EMI OUTLAWS "GREY ALBUM" On February 10, EMI sent cease and desist letters
    to DJ Danger Mouse and the handful of stores carrying his new release, the
    Grey Album, claiming copyright infringment. They Grey Album has garnered
    critical acclaim in Rolling Stone ("an ingenious hip-hop record that sounds
    oddly ahead of its time"), the New Yorker, the Boston Globe (the "most
    creatively captivating" album of the year), but EMI wants it destroyed
     
  10. esteso

    esteso NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    89
    re: Mach 5

    Well one issue that has not been discussed is that there are no developers releasing libraries in Mach 5 format. Even though it is touted as a "universal" sampler it is far from clear as to what you'll be giving up when importing samples from another format.

    This alone makes it a dicey proposition for the next little while.

    Kontakt is being widely adopted by developers and so it's a much better idea IMO to just get Kontakt working if possible.

    regards
     
  11. Briguy

    Briguy NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    124
    This has all become insane anymore. I'm not even going to get into it, but Technology is great but really x 2 seems to be taken away from doing what were all here to do "play and write music". I have at times said to my self "what the @&^$# am I doing with this computer recording and the BS that comes with it", but yet PC, Mac recording is really great and flexible when things arn't so buggy. So I as one get really frustrated when it comes to spending big bucks on software that just doesn't seem to work, update after update. I really don't know anymore. All I can say is STABILITY is the main concern here. Just my 2 cents, Im outa here.
     
  12. puffin733

    puffin733 NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    3
    I was reading all the replies to this interesting thread and I noticed that a lot of the users of Kontakt and Reaktor also use Propellorhead's Reason. Frustrated with Reaktor's incompatibility with DP and Kontakt's quirks, I went and bought myself a copy of Reason. What a bitchin' piece of software! I have no problem working with Reason until NI gets things working better.
     
  13. claudek

    claudek Forum Member

    Messages:
    896
    Reason works and is to the point.
    I think all NI products are great ideas but not all work well in logic.
     
  14. Septimus

    Septimus NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    5
    The don't work *at all* on a Mac platform, regardless of the sequencer.
     
  15. jjfreqy

    jjfreqy NI Product Owner

    Messages:
    11
    Core Audio might have something...

    "...regardless of the sequencer."

    OK, I'm still pretty new to my MAC and the software world of music production, but something happened yesterday that makes me wonder. I have a MOTU 828 MK II firewire soundcard on my G5.

    When I go and start up my sequencer (logic) I'm required to have the MOTU on first or Logic won't work correctly. Well, I had forgetten and fired up Logic w/o having the MOTU on and got the message about not finding the Core Audio device, blah, blah, blah *BUT* here's the thing, everything came up fine and my autoload logic file actually worked correctly.

    What I'm saying is that the problems that I was having w/ Logic after I installed Kontact were NOT present when my soundcard was off. The lag inside of logic and the autoload problem was fine, but I can't really do much w/o the soundcard on.

    I apologize if this is an obvious statement, but I do believe that Core Audio and Kontact may be the problem. As Septimus said, "...regardless of the sequencer."

    J
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.